- AI
- Air Pollution
- Arbitration
- Asia
- Automobile
- Bangladesh
- Banking
- Biodiversity
- Biological Inventions
- bLAWgathon
- Brand Valuation
- Business
- Celebrity Rights
- Company Act
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Consumer Protection Authority
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- CRI Guidelines 2025
- Cyber Law
- Cybersquatting
- Design
- Design Registration in Noida
- Digital Media
- Digital Right Management
- Dispute
- Doping
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Environment Law Practice
- ESIC Act
- EX-Parte
- Farmer Right
- Fashion Law
- FDI
- FERs
- Foreign filing license
- Foreign Law
- Gaming Industry
- GDPR
- Geographical Indication (GI)
- GIg Economy
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- IBC
- India
- Indian Contract Act
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IP registration in the USA
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- IT Act
- IVF technique
- Judiciary
- Khadi Industries
- labour Law
- Legal Case
- Legal Issues
- Lex Causae
- Licensing
- Live-in relationships
- Lok Sabha Bill
- Marriage Act
- Maternity Benefit Act
- Media & Entertainment Law
- Mediation Act
- Member of Parliament
- Mergers & Acquisition
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- News & Updates
- Non-Disclosure Agreement
- Online Gaming
- Patent Act
- Patent Application Drafting
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Description Writing
- Patent Fess
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Landscape
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent prosecution in India
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patents
- Personality rights
- pharma
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Pollution
- Posh Act
- Protection of SMEs
- RERA
- Sarfaesi Act
- SEBI
- Section 3(D)
- Signapore
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- Stamp Duty
- Stock Exchange
- Surrogacy in India
- TAX
- Technology
- Telecom Law
- Telecommunications
- Thailand
- Trademark
- Trademark Infringement
- Trademark Litigation
- Trademark Registration in Foreign
- Traditional Knowledge
- UAE
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
- WIPO
- Women Empower
Karnataka High Court Vacates Temporary Injunction Passed Previously In Favour Of Innoviti Against Pine Labs
Introduction A Patent infringement suit was filed by Innoviti Payment Solutions (“the Plaintiff”) regarding its point-of-sale (POS) terminal technology against Pine Labs (“the Defendant”) in the Addl. City Civil and Sessions Court wherein an interim injunction was granted in their favour. Thereafter, the Defendant moved the matter to the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court challenging the … Continue reading Karnataka High Court Vacates Temporary Injunction Passed Previously In Favour Of Innoviti Against Pine Labs
Read more »Analysis of Bar Council Notification Permitting Entry of Foreign Lawyers and Firms
Introduction In a recent momentous development in the legal world, The BCI has allowed foreign lawyers and firms to practise in India on a reciprocity basis.[1] Reciprocity here means the allowance of rights and privileges extended by BCI to the lawyers and firms of one state if it extends identical rights to Indian legal professionals.[2] … Continue reading Analysis of Bar Council Notification Permitting Entry of Foreign Lawyers and Firms
Read more »Capital Food Private Limited vs. Radiant Indus Chem Pvt. Ltd.
Introduction In addition to producing and marketing a wide range of dips, spreads, condiments, sauces, noodles, soups, pastes, dressings, ready-to-eat food products, and other food preparations, the plaintiff was one of India’s top food manufacturers. It was also the first to independently create the distinctive trade mark “SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY” for dips and spreads. The defendant … Continue reading Capital Food Private Limited vs. Radiant Indus Chem Pvt. Ltd.
Read more »Case Comment: Anumati vs Punjab National Bank
Introduction In India, commercial banks offer Fixed Deposit (“FD”) accounts to customers, which are often created in the joint names of two persons, payable to either of them or to the survivor among them. The issue in the present case arose out of a special leave petition against the order of the National Consumer Dispute … Continue reading Case Comment: Anumati vs Punjab National Bank
Read more »Analyzing the Unfair Play in E-Sports: Lack of Compliance in the Gaming Industry
Introduction With internet connectivity reaching almost all households globally, E-sports has gained soaring support.[1] After being featured as a demonstration sport in the Asian Games, in 2018, E-sports has built a strong foundation for being recognized as a real sport.[2] Moreover, the International Olympic Committee intends to initiate an ‘Olympic Virtual Series.’[3] Although no formally … Continue reading Analyzing the Unfair Play in E-Sports: Lack of Compliance in the Gaming Industry
Read more »Milaap Social Ventures India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.
Introduction The plaintiff filed a lawsuit for an injunction to stop the defendants and respondents from using the trademark “MILAAP” illegally. The petitioners/plaintiffs in the lawsuit assert that they registered a trademark application for the registration of their mark after incorporating their office in Singapore and then in India. According to the plaint, the petitioners … Continue reading Milaap Social Ventures India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.
Read more »Can passing of a Resolution Plan obliterate proceedings under section 138 of NI Act?
Introduction The Supreme Court of India vide its order dated 28th March, 2022 in Narinder Garg v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (“Narinder Garg”) decided upon the effect of the passing of a resolution plan, under section 30(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”), on the validity of proceedings under section 138 of the … Continue reading Can passing of a Resolution Plan obliterate proceedings under section 138 of NI Act?
Read more »Case Analysis: Pandrol Limited & Anr. v. Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt.
Introduction The Plaintiff no.1 is the industry leader in rail fastenings and track elasticity solutions headquartered in the United Kingdom. The plaintiff no.2 is a joint venture between the plaintiff no.1 and Rahee Industries Ltd. The defendant no.1 is a company in the business of dealing in railway track engineering. Defendants no.2 to 5 are … Continue reading Case Analysis: Pandrol Limited & Anr. v. Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt.
Read more »Doctrine Of Equivalents: An Approach To Analyse Patent Infringement
Introduction The advancement of new technologies throughout time has led to an unprecedented increase in patent-related conflicts. A patent is granted by a patent office, which is a monopoly right for a novel, useful, and non-obvious innovation. A patent holder has the right to prevent others from using their invention, and they are entitled to reasonable … Continue reading Doctrine Of Equivalents: An Approach To Analyse Patent Infringement
Read more »Relief for Body Cupid Private Limited – Karnataka High Court restrains the sale of products under the marks which are identical and similar to Wow Skin Science
Body Cupid Private Limited, a leading manufacturer of premium-quality personal care and wellness products, owns the brands WOW SKIN SCIENCE, WOW LIFE SCIENCE and BODY CUPID. The products under the brand, are being sold under the brand since the year 2014. Recently, Body Cupid became aware that one Mr. Gaurav Bhadani, through Mahadev Enterprises based … Continue reading Relief for Body Cupid Private Limited – Karnataka High Court restrains the sale of products under the marks which are identical and similar to Wow Skin Science
Read more »